![]() Government regulation of the kind Cook called for in his Brussels speech is one way to improve personal-data privacy, and probably a necessary one. It gives Apple moral cover while doing little to change the data economy the company claims to oppose. That might look like a severe punishment that will send a strong message to Facebook, and to other companies. That wasn’t enough for Apple, which canceled Facebook’s ability to distribute custom iPhone apps for internal use by Facebook employees. Facebook uses this information partly to improve its data profiles for advertisement, but also as a business-intelligence tool to help paint a picture of competitor behavior.Īfter the story broke, Facebook said it would shut down the iOS version of the program. ![]() ![]() Earlier this week, TechCrunch reported that Facebook had been paying people, including teens 13 to 17 years old, to install a “research” app that extracted huge volumes of personal data from their iPhones-direct messages, photos, emails, and more. The speech is worth revisiting in light of an emerging fight between Apple and Facebook. data-privacy law focused on minimizing data collection, securing that data, and informing users about its nature and use. “And these stockpiles of personal data serve only to enrich the companies that collect them.” Cook called for a comprehensive U.S. “But we also recognize that not everyone sees things as we do.” Cook was making an impassioned plea to end the technology industry’s collection and sale of user data. “We at Apple believe that privacy is a fundamental human right,” Apple’s CEO, Tim Cook, said in a privacy-conference keynote last year in Brussels.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |